User talk:PantheraLeo1359531

Archiv 0 | Archiv 2020| Archiv 2021

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, PantheraLeo1359531!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kindergarten Kinderoase 20210612 HOF01657.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heinrich-Gerber-Denkmal Hof 20210612 DSC00948.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shame about the cloud behind the white part of the object. But good quality for me.--Famberhorst 16:42, 25 July 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:42, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16 GiB-DDR4-RAM-Riegel RAM019FIX Small Crop 90 PCNT.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:45, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dacharbeiten Eppenreuther Straße 86, 95032 Hof 20210614 DSC01035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The leafes on the top should be cutted. --Steindy 23:40, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Windows 2.1 20201229 GER.png

Ich werde gerade nostalgisch (auch wenn ich damals mit 3.0 angefangen habe). Hast Du wirklich noch einen lauffähigen 386er, oder ist das System irgendwie emuliert? De728631 (talk) 20:14, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Das freut mich zu hören :). Leider nein, ich habe mal ein Bild von einer i486er-CPU (DX) hochgeladen, aber leider ist das System nur emuliert :D. Ich bin auch zugegebenermaßen noch zu jung für die Systeme :). --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 20:17, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Trotzdem vielen Dank für den Upload. Sowas hat ja schon dokumentarischen Wert. De728631 (talk) 20:24, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Sehr gerne! Definitiv! Ich hab mal geguckt, ob identisch dieser Screenshot vorhanden war, und er war es nicht. Deswegen habe ich ihn mal hochgeladen :). --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:24, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonnenschein in Hof-Krötenbruck 20210811 HOF03043crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 11:37, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Skalen der Unendlichkeit 20191028.png

File:Skalen der Unendlichkeit 20191028.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jochen Burghardt (talk) 15:35, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaugummiautomat am Kammergutweg 20210721 HOF01408.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:27, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wilhelm-Kohlhoff-Straße-Baum auf Wendehammerinsel 20210721 HOF01403.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please remove the disturbing object. --Steindy 00:12, 20 August 2021 (UTC)  Done Thanks, fixed --PantheraLeo1359531 10:35, 22 August 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:41, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zigarettenautomat am Südring 20210721 HOF01385.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments please fix the white borders at the top right and left and at the bottom --Sandro Halank 20:42, 19 August 2021 (UTC)  Done Thank you, fixed :) --PantheraLeo1359531 10:32, 22 August 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 14:01, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zigarettenautomat am Südring 20210721 HOF01382.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Mandelbrot20210829 FIX A1.png

File:Mandelbrot20210829 FIX A1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Victuallers (talk) 17:12, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Übersicht Altstadt 20210722 HOF01430.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments People at the left should be cropped out IMO --Ermell 07:28, 28 August 2021 (UTC)  Support A bit too much pavement at the bottom, but IMO good enough for QI. --Palauenc05 08:02, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altstadt 12 20210722 HOF01437.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:53, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bernhard-Lichtenberg-Platz 1, Pfarramt St. Marien 20210722 HOF01432.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Cayambe 10:40, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poststraße 2 20210722 HOF01457.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:17, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altstadt 35 20210722 HOF01479crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 19:31, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altstadt 41 20210722 Hof01482 RAW 202108240893.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 17:42, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beschädigte Tischtennisplatte am JCRG 20210904 HOF05258.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:53, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marienstraße 40 20210722 Hof01496 RAW 202108240905.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:44, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luitpoldstraße 8, Bäckerei 20210722 Hof01493 RAW 202108240903.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:44, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mahnmal Treue der Heimat 20210722 Hof01559 RAW 202108250990.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:33, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blücherstraße 20210722 Hof01575 RAW 202108271010cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:17, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fußballplatz Bismarckturmpark 20210722 Hof01604 RAW 202108271035CROP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 17:03, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agentur für Arbeit Bayreuth-Hof Hermann-Löns-Straße 20210726 HOF01690.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:34, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochspannungshäuschen Brüder-Grimm-Straße 20210726 HOF01789.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 17:56, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Samsung 870 QVO 8TB SATA 2,5 Zoll Internes Solid State Drive (SSD) (MZ-77Q8T0BW) 20211008 SSD023 corr.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The flat scan produces an odd effect (wouldn't be able to tell this from a flat plate if not for the printing), but good quality for QI --Rhododendrites 17:47, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiese am Krötenhofer Weg 20210722 Hof01621 RAW 202108271051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality although I have not found a tower. --F. Riedelio 06:32, 9 October 2021 (UTC) Thank you for your note. Indeed it was hard to find, I added an annotation :) --PantheraLeo1359531 13:08, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pausenplatz GSK 20210807 HOF02145.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 23:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eppenreuther Straße, Hotel Munzert 20210807 HOF02116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:23, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Mandeldrop20210909 04 ABC123 00001 65535x65535.png

File:Mandeldrop20210909 04 ABC123 00001 65535x65535.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

118.96.184.230 04:43, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altbau GSK Hof 20210807 Hof02148 RAW 202110131194.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:35, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

T289781

Seems like there may be a problem with your request here Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:41, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know, I received an email about this task. I will take a new try to upload it directly :), now some problems with uploading seem to be fixed --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:43, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Ferienhaus in Oll Deep, Bensersiel 20200907 Dsc3078032521 00RAWb.tif

File:Ferienhaus in Oll Deep, Bensersiel 20200907 Dsc3078032521 00RAWb.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

116.206.12.42 16:23, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Unterrichtungstafel Deutsche Teilung + Ullitz 20210808 HOF02393.jpg

Copyright status: File:Unterrichtungstafel Deutsche Teilung + Ullitz 20210808 HOF02393.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Unterrichtungstafel Deutsche Teilung + Ullitz 20210808 HOF02393.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:05, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

 Done --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:24, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drei-Freistaaten-Stein 20210808 HOF02429.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:16, 15 November 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:17, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhaltestelle Feilitzsch 20210808 HOF02414.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:16, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:59, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

FM Promotion

This file has been promoted to Featured media! The file File:MandelbulbRot 00000-10501 VP9 slow lossless.webm, which you nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:MandelbulbRot 00000-10501 VP9 slow lossless.webm, has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another file, please do so.

/FeaturedMediaBot (talk) 21:00, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund- und Mittelschule Bayerisches Vogtland 20210808 HOF02479.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 20:25, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:Nintendo Switch OLED-Modell (BeatEmUps) 20211001 07.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Nintendo Switch OLED-Modell (BeatEmUps) 20211001 07.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Abu-Dun (talk) 13:43, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ZDF-Hochhaus Mainz 20211105 HOF0779900001020211121 RAW-Exportcens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 20:34, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:09, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:MandelbulbRot 00000-10501 VP9 slow lossless.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! E-Auto des ZDF 20211105 HOF0780900002120211121 RAW-Exportcens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:38, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:06, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Logo Zero-COVID.jpg

File:Logo Zero-COVID.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No indication at https://zero-covid.org/language/en/ that this logo is free to use Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Acabashi (talk) 20:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

@Acabashi: : Objection: Work meets not threshold of originality in my opinion. --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 20:39, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

 Info Objection successful, file kept --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 11:46, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bismarckturm Front 20210809 HOF02708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:12, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JCRG Haupteinfahrt Fassade 20210809 HOF02782.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 17:15, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schillerstraße 33 20210812 HOF03119 RAW-Export 20211213000408cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:09, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Schöne Feiertage!

	✴ Happy Holidays, PantheraLeo1359531 ✴
	Merry Christmas and a happy new year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr! Желаю вам счастливого Рождества и Нового года! --Aristeas (talk) 17:39, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2021/2022!

		* Happy Holidays 2021/2022, PantheraLeo1359531! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:18, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JCRG-Röhre 20210814 HOF03362.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:14, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Köszönöm a példa lehetőséget! Luckylukee81 (talk) 07:13, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Einstein1 20210815 HOF03518.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MIGORMCZ 20:04, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amazon davinia am Studierendenwohnheim 20210815 HOF03531.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iridium REHAU AG + Co 20210808 HOF02317.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --A.Savin 12:48, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Südfassade iisys 20210815 HOF03537.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 18:11, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eckansicht iisys 20210815 HOF03489.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 15:59, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Richtungsweisendes Schild iisys Hof 20210815 HOF03486.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 15:59, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stahlskulptur Kubushochzeit bei der Hochschule Hof 20210815 HOF03571.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:38, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostfassade und Haupteingang Gebäude A 20210815 HOF03578.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. --Steindy 16:16, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mauer bei der Hochschule Hof 20210815 HOF03554.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:21, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kantenansicht iisys 20210815 HOF03548.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 15:59, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwischenraum zwischen Gebäude A und B Hochschule Hof 20210815 HOF03606.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schild Gebäude B HAW Hof 20210815 HOF03607.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Südkante Gebäude B Hochschule Hof 20210815 HOF03601.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Infotafel Alfons Goppel 20210815 HOF03595.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ansicht des Campus Hochschule Hof, Alfons-Goppel-Platz 20210815 HOF03594.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laden an einer E-Lade-Station an der Hochschule Hof 20210815 HOF03588.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 07:40, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gang Richtung Alfons-Goppel-Platz HAW Hof 20210815 HOF03670cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Prburley 17:28, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostteil Südfassade Hochschule Hof 20210815 HOF03663.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:27, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gang südlich des Gebäude A Hochschule Hof 20210815 HOF03654.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:19, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verbindungsbau Gebäude B und C HAW Hof 20210815 HOF03642.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:41, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haupteingang Gebäude C HAW Hof 20210815 HOF03617.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:41, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schild Gebäude A Hochschule Hof 20210815 HOF03672.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eingang Gebäude A Hochschule Hof 20210815 HOF03677cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mittelteil Südfassade Gebäude A Hochschule Hof 20210815 HOF03680.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Südwestkante Gebäude A Hochschule Hof 20210815 HOF03722.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Südwestkante Gebäude A Hochschule Hof 20210815 HOF03728.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 17:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 17:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gebäude D Ostfassade HAW Hof 20210815 HOF03708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schild Gebäude D HAW Hof 20210815 HOF03713.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mauerstücke HAW Hof 20210815 HOF03700.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Café Hochschule Hof 20210815 HOF03695.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weiher der Hochschule Hof 20210815 HOF03684.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 11:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Übersichtsfoto Gebäude B Hochschule Hof 20210815 HOF03762.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:20, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Segment Südfassade Gebäude B Hochschule Hof 20210815 HOF03760.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:36, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frontsicht Westteil Südfassade Gebäude B HAW Hof 20210815 HOF03743.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:35, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schiefsicht Westteil Südfassade Gebäude B HAW Hof 20210815 HOF03756.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 21:04, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! E-Ladestationsäule HAW Hof 20210815 HOF03872.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campus und Alfons-Goppel-Platz HAW Hof 20210815 HOF03865.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:39, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campus und Alfons-Goppel-Platz HAW Hof 20210815 HOF03851.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 17:28, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nördlicher Bereich iisys HAW Hof 20210815 HOF03825.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 16:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nördlicher Bereich iisys HAW Hof 20210815 HOF03832.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 14:12, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostfassade Gebäude C Hochschule Hof 20210815 HOF03817.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochschule Hof von Süden 20210815 HOF03911.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Südliche Einfahrt zur Hochschule Hof 20210815 HOF03903.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haupteingang SchillerGym Hof 20210821 HOF04031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 13:42, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostkorridor SchillerGym 20210821 HOF04086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 15:15, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fassade Haupteingang mit Teilbereich der Flügel SchillerGym 20210821 HOF04022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good balanced composition of the building with all lines balanced. Gnangarra 13:36, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower Westflügel SchillerGym 20210821 HOF04108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 03:48, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fassade Haupteingang SchillerGym 20210821 HOF04021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --IamMM 11:03, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Übersicht Ostflügel SchillerGym 20210821 HOF04079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 10:30, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Übersicht Westflügel SchillerGym 20210821 HOF04081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 10:30, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westfassade Anbau Westflügel SchillerGym 20210821 HOF04077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 10:30, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

FM Promotion

This file has been promoted to Featured media! The file File:MengerCut20211019 8000x8000p60 x265 lossless medium 0000-3585.webm, which you nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:MengerCut20211019 8000x8000p60 x265 lossless medium 0000-3585.webm, has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another file, please do so.

/FeaturedMediaBot (talk) 21:00, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Conner CP30174E Leiterplatte 20211210 HOF08290 RAW-Export 20211212000390 02.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wilhelmstraße 3 20210821 HOF04137 RAW-Export 20220127001214cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 21:23, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westendstraße 11 20210821 HOF04122 RAW-Export 20220127001211cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:03, 9 February 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --VileGecko 13:34, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luitpoldstraße 22, Haarstudio 20210821 HOF04132 RAW-Export 20220127001212cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:03, 9 February 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --VileGecko 13:34, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ansicht Südwestecke Anlage SchillerGym 20210821 HOF04107 RAW-Export 20220127001204cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --VileGecko 13:34, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verteilerkasten in der Luitpoldstraße 20210821 HOF04210.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 22:29, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wilhelmstraße 3, ehemaliges Geschäftshaus 20210821 HOF04206.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 22:29, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnhalleneingang Altstädter Schule 20210821 HOF04175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --VileGecko 12:34, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altstadt 30, Südfassade Einkaufsarkaden Hof 20210821 HOF04166.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 12:44, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Infotafel Jakobsweg durch Hof 20210821 HOF04162.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --VileGecko 12:34, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberes Tor 3, Schuhgeschäft 20210821 HOF04255 RAW-Export 20220128001285cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI--Lmbuga 16:47, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marienstraße 3, Imbiss 20210821 HOF04236.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:22, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trabant 601 S 20210821 HOF04282.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 16:29, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ansicht der Ludwigstraße 20210821 HOF04267 RAW-Export 20220128001299cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:39, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwigstraße 47, Schultor 20210821 HOF04294 RAW-Export 20220128001326cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality Lmbuga 12:47, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schultor zur Hofer Ludwigstraße 20210821 HOF04297.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality Lmbuga 12:49, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angebote in den Straßen Karolinen- und Ludwigstraße Hof 20210821 HOF04273crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:23, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! COVID-19-Hinweise Bürgergesellschaft Hof 20210821 HOF04247.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 13:14, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

durcheinander

Hallo PantheraLeo1359531, deine Dateien in [1] tragen Deutschland im Titel, behaupten aber österreichische Verkehrszeichen zu zeigen. Kannst du das bitte richtigstellen und passende Ortskategorien / Koordinaten ergänzen? Danke lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 16:13, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Oh sorry, da habe ich die falsche Template erwischt. Ich kümmere mich drum, danke --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:46, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Category:Am Schlafhübel (Hof (Saale))

Category:Am Schlafhübel (Hof (Saale)) is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: CSD C2 (unuseful empty category) If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead.

 

Palosirkka (talk) 09:24, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Ganzes Callcenter verarscht - Chef rastet aus! (Audio).ogg

File:Ganzes Callcenter verarscht - Chef rastet aus! (Audio).ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mateus2019 (talk) 07:38, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwigstraße 60, Modegeschäft 20210821 HOF04258 RAW-Export 20220128001287cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Gif animation from your video

Dust devil in a field, in Germany.

Gif animation from your video. Hello ! I made this animation from your video (I've boosted the saturation a bit) (I stabilized the 30 frames, too !). Sincerely, Bernard de Go Mars (talk) 17:37, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Oh cool, thank you for mentioning this :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 20:50, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:MengerCut20211019 8000x8000p60 x265 lossless medium 0000-3585.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Lob, Preis, Dank und Grüße

Hallo PantheraLeo1359531,

ich wollte Dir eigentlich schon lange einmal gratulieren, dass Deine neueren Fotos jetzt technisch wirklich sehr gut sind – auch die Nachbearbeitung/Raw-Entwicklung hast Du inzwischen ausgezeichnet im Griff. Das liegt (nehme ich an) nicht nur an der α7R IV und an den Objektiven, sondern auch einfach an der Erfahrung (ich selbst habe Jahre gebraucht, bis ich die Raw-Entwicklung richtig beherrscht habe, und bei manchen extremen Motiven macht sie mir immer noch Kopfzerbrechen ;–).

Bitte entschuldige, wenn das nach einem herablassenden/arroganten Lob klingt! So ist es nicht gemeint. Ich sehe nur einfach täglich auf Commons, Flickr etc. so viele an sich interessante Fotos, die aber technisch irgendwie daneben gegangen sind oder in der Nachbearbeitung verhunzt wurden, dass ich mich sehr über jeden Commons-Mitstreiter freue, der gute und sauber ausgearbeitete Bilder beiträgt.

Jetzt sehe ich aber, dass Du vorübergehend abwesen bist. Wenn Du einfach nur eine Pause etc. brauchst, dann ist das super – besser pausieren als sich zu sehr reinhängen und dann „ausbrennen“. Falls es allerdings an Stress mit irgendwelchen Kollegen, Vorschriften, Limitierungen usw. auf Commons liegt, wäre das schade; auch das kommt leider immer wieder vor. Falls ich vielleicht irgendwie vermitteln könnte, schreib mir einfach mal per E-Mail.

In jedem Fall also herzlichen Dank für Deine vielen schönen Bilder und liebe Grüße,

--Aristeas (talk) 15:12, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Aristeas,

danke Dir für Deine Nachricht :D. Ja, ich habe mal eine kurze Pause gebraucht, weil durch die momentanen Ereignisse einfach manches zu viel wurde. Ich versuche jetzt wieder aktiver zu sein und meinen Teil beizutragen :). Ich freue mich auch immer sehr, wenn es viele fleißige Fotografen gibt, die beitragen. Vieles ist einfach noch gar nicht bebildert oder teils sind die Bilder leider schon sehr alt.

Ja, das mit der RAW-Bearbeitung ist tatsächlich viel mit Lernen verbunden. Ich selbst habe auch Jahre gebraucht, auf den heutigen Stand zu kommen. Meine ersten Fotos waren nicht so gut, ich hoffe, die jetzigen sind brauchbar :).

Wichtig ist aber, dass es genug Freiwillige gibt, Dinge festzuhalten. Manche wichtigen Subjekte sind zeitlich sehr begrenzt oder werden abgerissen etc., da ist es wichtig, dass man zumindest ein Foto hat.

Danke und Grüße, --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:57, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Hallo PantheraLeo1359531,

vielen Dank für Deine Antwort – und sorry, dass ich nicht wieder geantworte habe (zu vieles um die Ohren ;–). Ja, ich kann Dir nur Zustimmen, viele Fotos sind schon deshalb wichtig, weil Dinge sonst unwiderbringlich verloren sind. (In diesem Sinne sind, neben Fotos abgerissener Gebäude usw., z.B. auch Deine Fotos von Covid-19-Maßnahmen sehr wertvoll – spätestens wenn man in ein paar Jahren oder Jahrzehnten den Verlauf der Pandemie und den Umgang damit beschreiben will, sind diese alltäglichen Dinge teils vergessen und solche Fotos als Beleg ausgezeichnet!)

Deine aktuellen Fotos sind wirklich mehr als „brauchbar“, sie sind meist sehr gut! :–) Nochmal herzliche Grüße, --Aristeas (talk) 14:09, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Danke danke! :). Ja natürlich, der zeithistorische Wert der Fotos steigt natürlich auch! Deswegen ist es gut, wenn man in paar Jahren zurückschauen kann :). Prima, dass du auch dabei bist :D.

Dann arbeiten wir mal fleißig weiter an guten Fotos, um auch weitere Dinge festzuhalten! Liebe Grüße, --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:31, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eichendorff-Schule HOF09502 20220313 RAW-Export 20220314001569cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:44, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Okarina der Zeit Rendering blau 20220321.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:03, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casio fx-85GT PLUS Scan 20220323.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwigstraße 5 20210821 HOF04355 RAW-Export 20220215001398cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:53, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maxgasse 20210821 HOF04351 RAW-Export 20220215001397cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:55, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maxplatz 22 20210821 HOF04341 RAW-Export 20220215001392cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:48, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theaterstraße 20210821 HOF04407 RAW-Export 20220215001421cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 17:12, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maxplatz 2a, 4 20210821 HOF04325 RAW-Export 20220215001384cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:08, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maxplatz 6, Dekanat Hof 20210821 HOF04327 RAW-Export 20220215001385cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:08, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jean-Paul-Gäßchen 20210821 HOF04432 RAW-Export 20220216001444B.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --aismallard 21:39, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Realschulgäßchen 4 20210821 HOF04427 RAW-Export 20220216001440cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 18:21, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloßplatz 20210821 HOF04429 RAW-Export 20220216001442cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:43, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eingang Fach- und Berufsoberschule Hof 20210821 HOF04422 RAW-Export 20220216001433.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:42, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klosterstraße 20 20210821 HOF04379 RAW-Export 20220215001410cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:38, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klosterstraße 20210821 HOF04382 RAW-Export 20220215001412cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:38, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bushaltestelle Unteres Tor 20210821 HOF04363 RAW-Export 20220215001406cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:20, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bismarck-Apotheke 20210821 HOF04448 RAW-Export 20220216001447cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Radomianin 21:44, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FFF-Demo 20220325 HOF09858.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Redlinks in the categories should be fixed. --F. Riedelio 06:55, 2 April 2022 (UTC)  Done Thanks, fixed :) --PantheraLeo1359531 16:19, 2 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 07:40, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hans-Böckler-Straße 1, Küchenmöbelgeschäft 20210821 HOF04470 RAW-Export 20220216001459.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 14:18, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brücke Q-Bogen 20210821 HOF04464 RAW-Export 20220216001454.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 14:18, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sparkasse Bismarckstraße 2 20210821 HOF04456 RAW-Export 20220216001448.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 14:18, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FFF-Demo 20220325 HOF09861.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO too dark. --XRay 04:52, 29 March 2022 (UTC)  Done Thanks, fixed :) --PantheraLeo1359531 16:19, 2 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 22:10, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vehikel Hofer Symphoniker 20210821 HOF04395 RAW-Export 20220215001417cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzung Parsevalstraße, Zeppelinstraße 20210821 HOF04486 RAW-Export 20220324001593cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 06:54, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Infotafel Jean-Paul-Weg 20210821 HOF04420 RAW-Export 20220216001432.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:21, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussichtsturm Mittelberg 20210913 HOF05435.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 15:22, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussichtsturm Mittelberg 20210913 HOF05540.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:08, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussichtsturm Mittelberg 20210913 HOF05563.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:13, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bus Linie 6 20210821 HOF04158 RAW-Export 20220127001218cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 17:46, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fundort der Himmelsscheibe von Nebra 20210913 HOF05574.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:58, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fundort der Himmelsscheibe von Nebra 20210913 HOF05573.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 18:53, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fundort der Himmelsscheibe von Nebra 20210913 HOF05567.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:21, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arche Nebra 20210913 HOF05659 RAW-Export 20220404001838cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:00, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eingang zum Fundort der Himmelsscheibe 20210913 HOF05613.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 15:49, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussichtsturm Mittelberg 20210913 HOF05524.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 11:31, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verweilhütte am Mittelberg 20210913 HOF05635.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:49, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2022 - Deutschland

Hallo PantheraLeo1359531,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2022 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist bereits zum neunten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2021 – Landschaft
• 

  Halde Jägersfreude

• 

  Naturschutzgebiet Wacholderhänge bei Wallersberg

• 

  Landschaftsschutzgebiet Heseler Wald und Umgebung

• Sieger WLE 2021 – Detail
• 

  Schneebedeckte Pappel-Schüpplinge im FFH-Gebiet Regnitz, Stocksee und Sandgebiete von Neuses bis Hallstadt

• 

  Blüten des Gamander-Ehrenpreis im Naturpark Taunus

• 

  Striegeliger Schichtpilz im Bruderwald in Bamberg

Seit dem vergangenen Jahr ist der Wettbewerb zweigeteilt, das heißt wir unterscheiden zwischen den beiden Bereichen Landschaft und Detail/Makro. Zu Landschaft zählen auch geschützte Einzelbäume. Im Bereich Detail/Makro werden Pflanzen, Tiere und Pilze bewertet.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen - zum Beispiel in Bayern Liste der Naturdenkmäler im Landkreis Würzburg oder in Sachsen Liste der Naturdenkmale in Stollberg/Erzgeb.

Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2022 – Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung.

In diesem Jahr feiert die FFH-Richtlinie ihren 30. Geburtstag. Aus diesem Grund vergeben wir fünf Sonderpreise für die Fotografen, die die meisten FFH-Gebiete fotografieren.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2022 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 12:03, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corsair MP400 20211221 01.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 19:35, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kyffhäuser-Denkmal mit Kaiser Wilhelm I. 20210914 HOF05695.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:53, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick vom Aussichtsturm Mittelberg 20210913 HOF05503 RAW-Export 20220404001753cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 17:41, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weg am Fundort Himmelsscheibe Nebra 20210913 HOF05565.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 14:48, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gesichtsförmige Verzierung Säule Kyffhäuser-Denkmal 20210914 HOF05708 RAW-Export 20220414001880.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:04, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussichtsturm Mittelberg 20210913 HOF05588.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Are the trees actually leaning, or is PC needed? --Tagooty 16:43, 13 April 2022 (UTC) I thought about this too, but after the perspective correction of other images, I assume that those trees are leaning, maybe due to the exposition of winds --PantheraLeo1359531 15:47, 20 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Ok. Good quality. --Tagooty 02:24, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick auf Hauptplattform Kyffhäuser-Denkmal 20210914 HOF05767 RAW-Export 20220414001932.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:38, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turm Kaiser-Wilhelm-I.-Denkmal 20210914 HOF05749 RAW-Export 20220414001916.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:58, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Чим займаються піротехніки ДСНС у Чистий четвер-.webm

File:Чим займаються піротехніки ДСНС у Чистий четвер-.webm has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: copy of File:Disposal of Russian bombs in Chernihiv, 21 April 2022.webm) Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Sneeuwschaap.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 15:37, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Ideen zu Kyffhäuser-Denkmal

Hallo PantheraLeo1359531,

Ikan hat mit Recht hervorgehoben, dass (auch) diese Aufnahme eine sehr gute Perspektive hat. Meiner Meinung nach könntest Du eigentlich beide Perspektiven nominieren, sie sind unterschiedlich genug. (Ich kann nicht garantieren, dass beide durchkommen, aber m.E. ist es auf jeden Fall einen Versuch wert ;–). Ich sehe für die FP-Nominierung der Ansicht von weiter weg nur 2 Probleme: (a) dass das Bild links etwas verblasst (klar, wegen der Sonne) und (b) die Leute; es sind wohl ein bisschen zu viele. Ideen dazu:

Zu (a): Probiere mal eine lokale Korrektur, sprich, füge beim Entwickeln der Raw-Datei links eine kreisförmige Maske hinzu (mit weichem Rand 50%) und setze in diesem Bereich den Regler „Dunst entfernen“ probeweise auf 10, 15 oder 20; außerdem könnte es sich lohnen, die Farbtemperatur in der Maske minimal anzupassen. Vielleicht sieht das Gestein des Denkmals dann etwas weniger verblasen aus. Die Kunst ist (natürlich), die Maske in Größe und Position so zu positionieren, dass der Übergang nicht auffällt. Es könnte hier aber eigentlich ganz gut funktionieren.

Zu (b): Hast Du vielleicht eine 2. Belichtung aus dieser Perspektive? Manchmal ist es eine gute Lösung, um Leute aus einen Bild zu beseitigen, die entsprechenden Teile aus einer anderen Aufnahme mit (annähernd) derselben Perspektive zu kopieren. Dafür sind Ebenen und ein bisschen „Herumgezerre“ nötig, dennoch klappt das oft relativ gut und das Ergebnis ist nicht „fake“, sondern eine (zulässige) Montage.

Herzliche Grüße, --Aristeas (talk) 08:25, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Aristeas,

danke Dir für deine Anmerkungen :). Ich werde ich mal gucken, inwieweit ich die Fotos bearbeiten kann, aber die Hinweise sind sehr hilfreich!

Grüße, --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 11:36, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Die Bildmanipulation hat einigermaßen gut geklappt :D, die Tipps waren prima, danke :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:38, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Gerne! Ich halte das für eine schönsten Seiten von Commons im Vergleich zu Flickr etc.: Während auf Flickr etc. jeder möglichst viel Anerkennung und Ruhm für sich allein will, arbeiten wir hier gemeinsam an einem gemeinsamen Bildarchiv und können uns auch gegenseitig Tipps geben, uns helfen usw. --Aristeas (talk) 17:49, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Das ist eine schöne Sicht! :) Und klar, gemeinsam an Dingen zu arbeiten, ermöglicht es, viel Besseres zu erwirken und vielen was zu bieten. Sei es jetzt die Hilfe bei SVGs, um gute Grafiken zu ermöglichen oder bei Fotos: Eine Person macht ein gutes Foto und ist vielleicht nicht so gut in Bildbearbeitung, kann die andere Person Tipps geben oder selber bearbeiten und so ein Gesamtresultat bringen, das wirklich gut ist. :) Ich bin ja sowieso der Meinung, dass gemeinsam mehr geht als alleine. Das ist leider manchmal nicht möglich, aber umso besser wenn es ist :D --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:03, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Und es ist natürlich immer schön, so freundliche Leute zu treffen :D --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:10, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kyffhäuserbrunnen 20210914 HOF05954 RAW-Export 20220415002084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:47, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahn am Kyffhäuserdenkmal 20210914 HOF05998 RAW-Export 20220415002129.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:20, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kyffhäuserdenkmal 20210914 HOF05972 RAW-Export 20220415002107corr Kopie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful, but eliminate one white hot pixel just to the left of and below the top center. Ikan Kekek 23:20, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krötenbrunnen 20220423 HOF00883 RAW-Export 20220427002428 Kopie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:32, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turm Kaiser-Wilhelm-I.-Denkmal 20210914 HOF05744 RAW-Export 20220414001909 Kopie corr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 07:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick vom Josephskreuz 20210914 HOF06050 RAW-Export 20220427002418.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Josephskreuz 20210914 HOF06021 RAW-Export 20220427002395.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:04, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Патрон продовжує розміновувати території поблизу Чернігова.webm

File:Патрон продовжує розміновувати території поблизу Чернігова.webm has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: copy of File:Explosive ordnance disposal in Chernihiv Oblast, 30 April 2022.webm) Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Sneeuwschaap.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 07:25, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:В Іспанії затримано проросійського блогера Анатолія Шарія, якого СБУ підозрює у державній зраді.webm

Copyright status: File:В Іспанії затримано проросійського блогера Анатолія Шарія, якого СБУ підозрює у державній зраді.webm

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:В Іспанії затримано проросійського блогера Анатолія Шарія, якого СБУ підозрює у державній зраді.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:07, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

 DoneThanks, license template error corrected. --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:25, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kyffhäuser-Denkmal mit Kaiser Wilhelm I. 20210914 HOF05695.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kyffhäuser-Denkmal mit Kaiser Wilhelm I. 20210914 HOF05695.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Trogen 20210825 HOF04551 RAW-Export 20220503002569cens Kopie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 15:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konstruktion Josephskreuz 20210914 HOF06069 RAW-Export 20220428002443.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:03, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick vom Josephskreuz HOF06051 RAW-Export 20220427002420.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick vom Josephskreuz HOF06055 RAW-Export 20220427002423.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments More meaningful filename needed as like the other nomination from here today too. Otherwise good, interesting and of high resolution. --Milseburg 19:22, 30 April 2022 (UTC) Thank you, renaming instructed :) --PantheraLeo1359531 13:13, 2 May 2022 (UTC) @PantheraLeo1359531: Then it will be better. But why do you always choose these cumbersome, long file names with the codes. Does it have to be that way? --Milseburg 13:37, 2 May 2022 (UTC)  InfoMore or less it is an automatic setting, I use this systematic names to organize them better --PantheraLeo1359531 09:37, 9 May 2022 (UTC) Useful in your collection, but I don't think on Commons these names are helpful anymore. When uploading, you should simplify them. --Milseburg 14:39, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sophienschule 20211020 HOF07229 RAW-Export 20220510002781CORR01 Kopie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:48, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostermarsch 20220416 HOF00538.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:36, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Pius 20220325 HOF09991 RAW-Export 20220509002746.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 06:25, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friwi-Werk Stolberg (Harz) 20210915 HOF06354 RAW-Export 20220503002642cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 21:27, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes Kino (Stolberg (Harz)) 20210915 HOF06349cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 21:26, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Natur am Untreusee und Eppenreuth 20220510 HOF01601.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:13, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick nach Westen vom Kaiser-Wilhelm-I.-Denkmal 20210914 HOF05789 RAW-Export 20220414001950.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Postkasten in Eppenreuth HOF01624cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 17:38, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Natur um Eppenreuth HOF01611.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 19:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gedenkstein Wittelsbacher Park 20220416 HOF00703.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeichen 434-51 im Harz 20210916 HOF06452 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:50, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kanaldeckel Wernigerode 20210916 HOF06423.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:39, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brunnen auf dem Marktplatz Wernigerode 20210916 HOF06396.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and quite a beautiful motif. -- Ikan Kekek 12:11, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitteldeutscher Rundfunk Sachsen-Anhalt Wernigerode 20210916 HOF06376cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:29, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feuerwehr Stolberg Harz 20210917 HOF06470cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 17:12, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3D-Modell des Sierpinski-Dreiecks 20220520 Iteration 10.stl, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Very nice. --XRay 06:34, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhofstraße 25 20220416 HOF00721cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:05, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rathaus Trogen 20210825 HOF04771cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schulstraße, Schäfereistraße Trogen 20210821 HOF04796.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:30, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feuerwehrgebäude Trogen 20210825 HOF04580cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:31, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karl-Marx-Statue Wernigerode 20210916 HOF06371.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Horizontal perspective distortion perspective distortion, correction would be desirable. --F. Riedelio 16:21, 23 May 2022 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint, I tried a new version --PantheraLeo1359531 19:29, 25 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 06:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CVJM Trogen 20210825 HOF04818.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 14:27, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Denkmalgeschützter Stein in Trogen 20210825 HOF04760.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Straßennamensschild Regnitzstraße Trogen 20210825 HOF04826.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:18, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Straße An der Zech Trogen (Oberfranken) 20210825 HOF04860cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A good photo. The election posters (especially that of Nürnberger) are unfortunately annoying. They are also not permanently attached and should be deleted. --Steindy 19:45, 25 May 2022 (UTC)  Comment Good quality to me, and I would oppose editing the election posters out of the photo. They're quite clearly de minimis and thus not an FoP problem, but they're visible when zoomed in and useful as documentation of part of the life of a town. I'll hold off on promoting this photo to give you the privilege to oppose first if you so choose, whereupon I will support and we'll go to CR. I don't think this nomination would be declined there. -- Ikan Kekek 03:24, 26 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Having given you a couple of days to react, I'm changing the status to Promotion. Vote to decline if you like. -- Ikan Kekek 10:55, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuhrmannstraße 20220508 HOF01293 RAW-Export 20220530003287cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teich zwischen Pfaffenteich und Lausenhof 20220531 HOF03126.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:14, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Knollenteich 20220531 HOF03111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:53, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

--Pi bot (talk) 07:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strauß-Areal 20220511 HOF01871cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 20:18, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gedenkstein Hermann-Müller-Anlage 1998 20210903 HOF04928.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:07, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Infotafel Granitfindlinge 20210903 HOF04920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:07, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gedenkstein Gottlob Thomas Theresienstein 20210903 HOF04974.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:08, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weisheitstempel Theresienstein 20210903 HOF04960 RAW-Export 20220528003175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Terragio67 16:35, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anlage Labyrinth Theresienstein 20210903 HOF04943.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:44, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussichtsplattform Labyrinth Theresienstein 20210903 HOF04938.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:44, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus Theresienstein 20210903 HOF05008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:04, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katzenstatue Theresienstein 20210903 HOF05135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. However, I don't think Category:Cats in Hof (Saale) is supposed to be for statues. I'd also like you to identify the sculptor in your file description if you know or can find out who that is. Finally, and least importantly, you could could consider some categories for the trees. I probably wouldn't have mentioned that if I hadn't seen the berries. -- Ikan Kekek 14:44, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JGAW-RS Hof 20210904 HOF05191 RAW-Export 20220607003379cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:27, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Südfassade Hauptteil JCRG Hof 20210904 HOF05172.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:04, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Südfassade Hauptteil JCRG Hof 20210904 HOF05174.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:04, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bismarckturm 20210904 HOF05156.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:23, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wendeltreppe JGAW-RS Hof 20210904 HOF05176.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aismallard 22:42, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shuttle an Shuttlehaltestelle 20220610 HOF04659cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The red categories should be fixed. --Ermell 21:53, 10 June 2022 (UTC) Thanks for the hint, fixed :) --PantheraLeo1359531 13:29, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schleizer Straße in Hof-Studentenberg 20220614 HOF04717cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:33, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bäckerei und Konditorei Eppenreuther Straße 20210905 HOF05294cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:16, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle am Sportbereich JCRG 20210904 HOF05239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 17:08, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Артём 13327 (talk) 19:47, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verkehrssicherungsanhänger VSA FFW Trogen 20220618 HOF05165 RAW-Export 20220623003721.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:45, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schauchboot DLRG 20220618 HOF05145 RAW-Export 20220623003720.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 20:55, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle Kreuzung Südring-Eppenreuther Straße 20211010 HOF07007cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:33, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle Kreuzung Südring-Eppenreuther Straße 20211010 HOF06991.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:56, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Einsteighalle des ersten Hofer Bahnhofs von 1848 20211020 HOF07311cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:58, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Longoliusplatz 1 20211020 HOF07292cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 21:09, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gedenktafel für die im Ersten Weltkrieg verstorbenen Feuerwehrmänner 20211020 HOF07306.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:25, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lutherkirche 20220712 HOF06422.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 18:29, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallplatz 3-5 FFW Hof 20211020 HOF07299cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:03, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bushaltestelle Am Hohen Münster 20211030 HOF07764cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 July 2022 (UTC)