FYI author photosEdit

IA "Evacuation" of Public domain resources...Edit

See Commons:Village_pump/Proposals#Mass_"Evacuation"_copy_of_Public_domain_resources_from_Internet_Archive_to_Commons. IS this something one of your Bots could assist with, given the scripts F%C3%A6 was using to do User_talk:Fæ/CCE_volumes#Forks?

Category:Photographs of paintings by User:SailkoEdit

Hi Jarek, I just noticed this category. quite a few files in it still use {{Information}}. Any reason why these haven't been replaced like this? Otherwise I can have a bot do that. Multichill (talk) 21:08, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

We did talk about it couple years ago here. I think I created it in order to work on SDC data, but forgot about it. A lot of files there need help: Some are still using {{Information}}, and a lot are using {{Artwork}} with wrong fields. Many of those photographs could be added to Wikidata's image with frame (P7420). If you want to convert {{Information}} templates I can look into {{Artwork}}s. --Jarekt (talk) 21:15, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
@Multichill: --Jarekt (talk) 21:16, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Bot is done with conversion of {{Information}}. Multichill (talk) 19:48, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
@Multichill: Nice. I will start converting {{Artwork}} templates.--Jarekt (talk) 02:19, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
@Multichill and Sailko: It took a while but all the files in Category:Photographs of paintings by User:Sailko have {{Art Photo}} template separating photograph and artwork metadata and licenses. Now it would be nice to connect more of them to Wikidata. Also a lot of them could also be used as image with frame (P7420). --Jarekt (talk) 03:42, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
I just want to thank you again for fixing and connecting more deeply my photographs. I wish I could fix directly the template easily in Upload Wizard, but this feature is not available yet, and I really appreciate your work ad support. --Sailko (talk) 14:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

June-voting still closedEdit

Good morning, just for your info: June-voting is still closed: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Photo_challenge?uselang=de#June_2022 - best regards --Gordito1869 (talk) 07:54, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

  Done --Jarekt (talk) 19:58, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-28Edit

19:22, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Object photoEdit

Hi Jarekt, now that Object photo is finally gone (many thanks for that) ... I wonder if it's worth bringing back? But in a different form! Using "Art Photo" is somewhat specific, since it's just supposed to be artwork, but there are many cases where I'd love to be able to say "this is a photo of this building" and bring in all the relevant info from Wikidata, in exactly the same way that Art Photo works. What do you (and @Multichill: ) think? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:38, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Mike, Currently {{Object photo}} template redirect to {{Art Photo}}, so you can use either name. That should help if the issue is that "Art Photo" term is too specific for some files. Was that what you had in mind? Or there should be some differences? --Jarekt (talk) 22:31, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
I was more worried about the tracking categories rather than anything else, TBH. For example, Category:Artworks with Wikidata item would get rather polluted with non-artworks, and I don't know how it would affect auto-imports to SDC... Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 06:15, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
@Mike Peel: I think we talked about this before, but didn't follow up on it. My use case would be:
On File:Haarlem, Grote Kerk.jpg we have several depicts (P180) and one main subject (P921) statement set to Grote Kerk (Q1545193). A template should pull the relevant data about Grote Kerk (Q1545193) from Wikidata and display that in a user-friendly way. We probably want to add domain specific logic based on what the main subject is. We already have domain specific logic for artworks, logical next step would be buildings (everything covered by Wiki Loves Monuments). Later we can add other domains like taxonomy. Multichill (talk) 19:33, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
@Multichill: That's a good example. I'd prefer if we could approach this generally, without assuming artwork/building/taxonomy. But whatever would work. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:35, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
The approach should definitely be generic (general), but in a modular way so it's easy to add domain specific logic. Multichill (talk) 19:39, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
@Multichill and Mike Peel: Sorry I was not around last few days. Most of the logic {{Artwork}} uses seems to be valid for other items. We do have small differences between {{Artwork}}, {{Book}} and {{Photograph}} which are all powered by Module:Artwork. Some other infoboxes like {{Map}} had very large number of other fields and was just too hard to add to already bursting Module:Artwork codebase. I feel like next template to add could be something to support artworks found in books (there were already some discussions about it) and maybe something for archival documents (like stuff here. --Jarekt (talk) 01:17, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-29Edit

22:58, 18 July 2022 (UTC)