↓ Skip to nominations ↓

Other languages:

These are the candidates for becoming quality images. This is not the same thing as featured pictures. If you want informal feedback on your photos, please ask at Commons:Photography critiques.

Purpose[edit]

The purpose of quality images is to encourage the people that are the foundation of Commons, the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection. While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users’ efforts in providing quality images to Commons. Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.

Guidelines[edit]

All nominated images should be the work of Commons users.

For nominators[edit]

Below are the general guidelines for Quality images; more detailed criteria are available at Image guidelines.

Image page requirements[edit]

Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.

Creator[edit]

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Technical requirements[edit]

More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.

Resolution[edit]

Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.

Image quality[edit]

Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.

Composition and lighting[edit]

The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.

Value[edit]

Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.

How to nominate[edit]

Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description  --~~~~ |}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.

Number of nominations[edit]

No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.

Note: If possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.

Evaluating images[edit]

Any registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination. For an easier evaluation you can activate the gadget QICvote

When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.

How to review[edit]

Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.

If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you liked it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Promotion and add your signature, possibly with some short comment.

If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you didn't like it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.

Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first.

Grace period and promotion[edit]

If there are no objections within a period of 2 days (exactly 48 hours) from the first review, the image becomes promoted or fails according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.

How to execute decision[edit]

QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then consider also nominating the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

Manual instructions (open only in cases of emergency)

If promoted,

Add the image to appropriate group or groups of Quality images page. The image also needs to be added to the associated sub pages, only 3–4 of the newest images should be displayed on the main page.
Add {{QualityImage}} template to the bottom of image description page.
Move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 2022.
Add the template {{File:imagename.jpg}} to the user’s talk page.

If declined,

move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 2022.

Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red

Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)[edit]

Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 23 2022 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.

Consensual review process[edit]

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

How to ask for consensual review[edit]

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.

Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page.

Consensual review rules[edit]

See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules

Page refresh: purge this page's cache

Nominations[edit]

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 12:54, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms

Please nominate no more than 5 images per day.

July 23, 2022[edit]

- Nomination: Acinonyx jubatus. By User:Byrdyak --IamMM 12:53, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Lyrurus tetrix. By User:Spjutkastare --IamMM 12:53, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Baby Sri Lankan elephant (Elephas maximus maximus). By User:Senthiaathavan --IamMM 12:53, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Pieris rapae. By User:Сергій Мірошник --IamMM 12:53, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Equus quagga boehmi. By User:Byrdyak --IamMM 12:53, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Ceiling of the Basilique Notre-Dame de la Garde --Jsamwrites 12:38, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Angel sculpture on top of a former hospital dome --Romainbehar 12:16, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Bell 429 of Air Transport Europe at ILA 2018 --MB-one 11:58, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Range Rover SV Coupe covered up for the night at Geneva International Motor Show 2018 --MB-one 11:58, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Bentley Continental S2 at Techno-Classica 2018 --MB-one 11:58, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination City harbour Barth (Western Pomerania): MS Stadt Barth and building of the port authority. --JoachimKohler-HB 10:57, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --MB-one 11:58, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Bizovik, settlement in Ljubljana Municipality. --Miha Peče 10:37, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Melex 3 N. Car-Cargo Model 391.1 in Barth, Western Pomerania. --JoachimKohler-HB 10:09, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Glockner Group, seen from the Seehorn in the Berchtesgaden Alps, looking southward --Milseburg 09:25, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Großvenediger, seen from the Seehorn in the Berchtesgaden Alps, looking southwestward --Milseburg 09:25, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --IamMM 12:41, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Meripuistokatu street seen from Kemi City Hall. --Kallerna 08:54, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 10:15, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Rose fields in Vampula, Finland. --Kallerna 08:54, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Stempfermühle near Gößweinstein --Ermell 08:02, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 10:07, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Aerial view of the basilica and castle in Gößweinstein --Ermell 08:02, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Aerial view of the basilica in Gößweinstein --Ermell 08:02, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 11:01, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Aerial view of Gößweinstein --Ermell 08:02, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Aerial view of the basilica in Gößweinstein --Ermell 08:02, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --IamMM 12:41, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination A mug of matcha tea latte with "Rosetta" latte art served in a restaurant in Sukabumi, West Java, Indonesia. --Irvan Ary Maulana 07:57, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 08:59, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination High-speed line Lille-London as seen from the Europe footbridge, in Saint-André-lez-Lille, France --Velvet 07:11, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --IamMM 12:41, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Café de la Gare, Rue de la Gare 70, Saint-André-lez-Lille, France --Velvet 07:10, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Fountain on the Subtropical Terraces and Belvedere, Wilhelma, Stuttgart --Llez 05:43, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good qualitry --Michielverbeek 06:46, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Fountain on the Subtropical Terraces, Wilhelma, Stuttgart --Llez 05:43, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 09:34, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Building at Hauptstraße 22 in Pegnitz, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:40, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Building at Hauptstraße 16 in Pegnitz, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:40, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Wikibusters 11:42, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Building at Hauptstraße 9 in Pegnitz, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:40, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:46, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Building at Hauptstraße 7 in Pegnitz, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:40, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:46, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Building at Hauptstraße 1 in Pegnitz, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:40, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:46, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Groningen (city), Provincial House (Groningen) Entrance of the porter's house. (West side.)
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:40, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Groningen (city), Provincial House (Groningen) Detail of the facade. (West side.)
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:40, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Space Needle (north view) in Seattle, Washington, USA --XRay 03:14, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Grand Prismatic Spring, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA --XRay 03:14, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Starting train on the railroad line “BNSF Scenic Subdivision” in Seattle, Washington, USA --XRay 03:14, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Cruise ship “Norwegian Bliss” at Pier 66 in Seattle, Washington, USA --XRay 03:14, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Clepsydra Geyser (Lower Geyser Basin) in the Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA --XRay 03:14, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Juglans regia on 10. Oktober Straße, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:21, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:15, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination ÖBB Cityjet at the station of the railway line Drautalbahn, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:21, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:15, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Restaurant Sissi at «Österreichischer Hof» on Bahnhofplatz, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:21, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:15, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Restaurant Sissi on Bahnhofplatz, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:21, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:17, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Café bar Wikibowls on Hauptstraße #160, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:21, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:17, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination View of hotsprings of Federación, Entre Rios Province, Argentina --Ezarate 00:06, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. Minor CAs at the right. Please try to fix it. --XRay 03:18, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 22, 2022[edit]

- Nomination: View of hot springs of Federación, Entre Rios Province, Argentina --Ezarate 23:59, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: View of hot spring of Federación, Entre Rios Province, Argentina --Ezarate 23:46, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Lands near Uruguay River, Federación, Entre Rios Province, Argentina --Ezarate 23:35, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Olympic swimming pools in Federation, Entre Rios Province, Argentina --Ezarate 23:29, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Abbey church of Saint-Antoine-l'Abbaye, chapel 1, west window. --Yann 21:47, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:44, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Abbey church of Saint-Antoine-l'Abbaye, chapel 1, north window. --Yann 21:35, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --IamMM 12:51, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Abbey church of Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, chapel 5, statue of the Virgin. --Yann 21:33, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Impressionen der Kriegsgräberstätte der Bombenopfer am Eingang des Hauptfriedhofs Würzburg.An dieser Gedenkstätte sind weitere Ehrenmale für die Toten verschiedener Kriege aufgestellt. Hier Fernaufklärergruppe 123 --Nightflyer 20:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Chand Baori --Chainwit. 19:40, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Courtyard of Rambagh Palace --Chainwit. 19:40, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Guan Di Temple --Chainwit. 19:40, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Decline Oppose Unfortunately unsharp and noisy. -- Ikan Kekek 21:04, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Srifuengfung Building --Chainwit. 19:40, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Wat Chedi Yot Thong (Wat Chedi Thong), Phitsanulok --Chainwit. 19:40, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Natural monument Schustergraben in Langenstein/Austria --Hans Koberger 19:30, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Natural monument Schustergraben in Langenstein/Austria --Hans Koberger 19:30, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Brodick Castle --Mike Peel 18:42, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Torr Righ/King's Cave Trail, Arran --Mike Peel 18:42, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: King's Cave, Arran --Mike Peel 18:42, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Torr Righ/King's Cave Trail, Arran --Mike Peel 18:42, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: London Plane Platanus × hispanica fruit, Annecy --Mike Peel 18:42, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Boxlip mullet (Oedalechilus labeo), Arrábida Natural Park, Portugal --Poco a poco 18:37, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality, photo has been made under water --Michielverbeek 20:33, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Furbellow (Saccorhiza polyschides), Arrábida Natural Park, Portugal --Poco a poco 18:37, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --IamMM 12:51, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Snakelocks anemone (Anemonia viridis), Arrábida Natural Park, Portugal --Poco a poco 18:37, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Very Good quality. --Wikibusters 18:48, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Sea anemone (Aiptasia couchii), Arrábida Natural Park, Portugal --Poco a poco 18:37, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Very Good quality. --Wikibusters 18:47, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Greater pipefish (Syngnathus acus), Arrábida Natural Park, Portugal --Poco a poco 18:37, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Tambukansky Nature Reserve, Zolsky district, Kabardino-Balkaria--AlixSaz 15:40, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:41, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Chegem gorge: In the gorge of the Chegem river, Kabardino-Balkaria--AlixSaz 15:40, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Narzan Valley, Zolsky district, Kabardino-Balkaria--AlixSaz 15:40, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose It lacks sharpness, sorry, not a QI to me --Poco a poco 18:41, 22 July 2022
  I withdraw my nomination I agree, I withdraw from the nomination.--AlixSaz 03:57, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Narzan Valley, Zolsky district, Kabardino-Balkaria --AlixSaz 15:40, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: District of mining and sanitary protection of the ecological and resort region Caucasian Mineral Waters--AlixSaz 15:15, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Saint-Ulrich Castle in Ribeauvillé (Haut-Rhin, France). By User:Aristeas --Gzen92 15:13, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 18:39, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:41, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Lampadaire au bord du lac à Genève --Wikibusters 14:42, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:41, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Coastline of Raftsundet at Digermulen, Nordland, Norway --Ximonic 13:15, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Very nice and sharp. Metadata mention a higher resolution. Where does the difference come from? --Milseburg 13:35, 22 July 2022 (UTC) Comment A stitch & crop work of couple of shots together. I believe there is nothing of importance to miss out in this one. --Ximonic 02:19, 23 July 2022 (UTC) Thank you. Totally ok for me. Very good quality. --Milseburg 09:27, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Unstadsjøveien road at Unstad, Vestvågøy, Norway --Ximonic 13:15, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Wikibusters 14:44, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Small bridge of Susiraja crosses Krapuoja river, Vantaa, Finland --Ximonic 13:15, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:44, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Lofotmuseet in Vågan, Norway --Ximonic 13:15, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:44, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Vatterfjorden and Langstrandtindan and Rulten mountains in Vågan, Norway --Ximonic 13:15, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Nice --Poco a poco 18:46, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination The west side of the Seehorn in the Berchtesgaden Alps, over which the normal route is leading. --Milseburg 12:39, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Wikibusters 14:44, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Church of Sant Climent de Peralta near La Bisbal, Catalonia, Spain --Kritzolina 12:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Wikibusters 14:44, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Can Mascarós, a cultural heritage building in Ullastret, Catalonia, Spain --Kritzolina 12:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Sunflower and grain field in Baix Empordà, Catalonia, Spain --Kritzolina 12:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --IamMM 12:51, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination 1936 Zettelmeyer tractor. --Palauenc05 11:17, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good image of a rare tractor -- Spurzem 18:22, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Grossostheim, protected landscape element Sprenkenhohle, in nature park Spessart, Ochsenstutz --KaiBorgeest 10:46, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Aerial view of Oberngrub --Ermell 10:39, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:44, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Toyota Land Cruiser (J40) --Ermell 10:39, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Wikibusters 14:44, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Aerial view of a cherry orchard --Ermell 10:39, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 12:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Aerial view of Dürrbrunn near Unterleinleiter in Upper Franconia --Ermell 10:39, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:46, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Crucifix near Dürrbrunn --Ermell 10:39, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 12:41, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Side view of a 1963 Porsche Junior tractor. --Palauenc05 10:38, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Wikibusters 14:44, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Remains of Pütniz Airbase --MB-one 10:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  Strange object at the right side and the sharpness could be better. --Ermell 10:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
  That's a seagull. --MB-one 20:17, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Škoda Kodiaq at Tuning World Bodensee 2018 --MB-one 10:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  I would clone out the metal bar at the bottom --Poco a poco 18:46, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Floating stage at Maker Faire Berlin 2018, FEZ Wuhlheide --MB-one 10:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Five Guys restaurant at Frankfurt Hauptwache in January 2021 (during the 2nd wave of the Covid-19 pandemic in Germany) --MB-one 10:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Great banded grayling (Brintesia circe) --Charlesjsharp 09:53, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --MB-one 10:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Great banded grayling (Brintesia circe) --Charlesjsharp 09:53, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:36, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye museum collection. --Yann 08:47, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:54, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye museum collection. --Yann 08:36, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Mansion, Rue Gambetta 21, Saint-André-lez-Lille, France --Velvet 07:08, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 09:28, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Eclectic house, Avenue du Maréchal Foch 6, Lambersart, France --Velvet 07:06, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 09:28, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Moorish house and greenhouses at the Subtropical Terraces, Wilhelma, Stuttgart --Llez 05:43, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:12, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Moorish Garden, Wilhelma, Stuttgart --Llez 05:43, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:12, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Muiden, Detail of Barracks Muiden. National monument. Northwest West side.
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Scheersluis in Kamperveen. Lock complex in the Reevediep. (sound system.)
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Saint Bartholomew church in Pegnitz, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Residenz in Ansbach, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Schaitbergerstraße 14 in Ansbach, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Capital in the Predigerkirche in Rottweil, Baden-W., Germany. --Tournasol7 04:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Schwarzes Tor in Rottweil, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Space Needle (north view) in Seattle, Washington, USA --XRay 03:47, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Grand Prismatic Spring, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA --XRay 03:47, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:11, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Skyscrapers seen from the waterfront, Seattle, Washington, USA --XRay 03:47, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:11, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Lamp on a house on Pike Street in Seattle, Washington, USA --XRay 03:47, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:37, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Lower Geyser Basin in the Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA --XRay 03:47, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:11, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Residential building on Heinrich-von-Türlin-Straße #2 in Lind, Villach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Window at the villa on Genotteallee #18 in Lind, Villach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Verticals and horizontals should be adjusted. Or is it real? --XRay 03:49, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
  Done @XRay: Thanks for your review. Horizontals and verticals were actualized. —- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Avant-corps of the residential building on Heinrich-von-Türlin-Straße #3b in Lind, Villach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Villa on Heinrich-von-Türlin-Straße #5 in Lind, Villach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Residential building on Kasmanhuberstraße #6 in Lind, Villach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination High Point High School sign and building, Beltsville, MD --Lorax 01:33, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 21, 2022[edit]

- Nomination Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye museum collection. --Yann 21:34, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:55, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye museum collection. --Yann 21:28, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye museum collection; --Yann 21:23, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye museum collection. --Yann 21:15, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review Comment Poor description. --Palauenc05 09:31, 22 July 2022 (UTC) There is no more information in the museum. If anyone knows what this relief shows, please complete. Yann 09:58, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye museum collection. --Yann 21:15, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:45, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  Comment Poor description. --Palauenc05 09:31, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Alzenau, quarry between Hoerstein and Hohl, geotope 671A015, in nature park Spessart --KaiBorgeest 19:34, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Greenlandic trawler, Bingo III GR 2-122, dodging bergy bits, coming into ice choked Ilulissat Harbor. Greenland. --GRDN711 18:59, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  The noise should be reduced. --Ermell 20:31, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Greenlandic trawler, Bingo III GR 2-122 coming into ice choked Ilulissat Harbor. Greenland. --GRDN711 18:59, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  Very noisy. A much lower ISO and slower shutter would have given better results. --Tagooty 04:42, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Brown argus (Aricia agestis) male --Charlesjsharp 18:06, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --IamMM 18:18, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Large skipper (Ochlodes sylvanus) male --Charlesjsharp 16:56, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:07, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Marbled fritillary (Brenthis daphne) --Charlesjsharp 16:56, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:07, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Large white (Pieris brassicae) --Charlesjsharp 16:56, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:14, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Large wall brown (Lasiommata maera) --Charlesjsharp 16:56, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:07, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Porsche 911 GT3 RS covered before the world premiere at Geneva International Motor Show 2018 --MB-one 16:28, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Cirrus SR-22 on static display preview, EBACE 2018 --MB-one 16:28, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:04, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Continental Mark IV at Classic Days Berlin 2019, Kurfürstendamm, Berlin-Charlottenburg --MB-one 16:28, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Coral (Pocillopora verrucosa), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt --Poco a poco 15:44, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --MB-one 16:28, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Coral (Favia favus), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt --Poco a poco 15:44, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 17:22, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Coral (Dipsastraea favus), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt --Poco a poco 15:44, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 17:18, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Coral (Sarcophyton glaucum), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt --Poco a poco 15:44, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 17:15, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Coral (Acropora hyacinthus), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt --Poco a poco 15:44, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --IamMM 18:18, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination The Lausenhof in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 13:23, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:02, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Work of urban district heating) in en:Saint-Étienne, France. --Touam 11:58, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Torre-Presó, the former prison tower in Ullastret, Catalonia, Spain - the door --Kritzolina 11:15, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Prburley 14:05, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Passageway in Carrer de la Mare de Déu de Montserrat with Madonna in La Bisbal d'Empordà, Catalonia, Spain --Kritzolina 11:15, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Stacked chairs for a restaurant in a street near the church of Palamós, Catalonia, Spain --Kritzolina 11:15, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:46, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Stacked chairs for a restaurant in a street near the church of Palamós, Catalonia, Spain --Kritzolina 11:15, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:14, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination The Vaudricourt windmill, in the Musée de Plein Air, in Villeneuve d'Ascq, France --Velvet 10:43, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:45, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Sundial in the garden of the Musée de Plein Air, in Villeneuve d'Ascq, France --Velvet 10:41, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Taking minerals from stools Polyura athamas Drury, 1773 Common Nawab (by Kush.butterfly) --Atudu 08:56, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Natural monument Lederer Haufen, Danube, Mitterkirchen/Austria --Hans Koberger 07:31, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:46, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Natural monument Lederer Haufen, Danube, Mitterkirchen/Austria --Hans Koberger 07:31, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Road from Dürrbrunn to Kalteneggolsfeld --Ermell 07:30, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Aerial view of Kalteneggolsfeld --Ermell 07:30, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 09:39, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Aerial view of Kalteneggolsfeld --Ermell 07:30, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Aerial view of Engelhardsberg --Ermell 07:30, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 09:38, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination St. George's Catholic Chapel in Oberngrub --Ermell 07:30, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 09:36, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Hen and juveniles at the AGF farm in Rhinau (Bas-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 07:25, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Bridge in the forest of Mackenheim (Bas-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 07:25, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Focus cabin of the Cambridge telescope --Mike Peel 06:39, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  Too tight, green CA --Poco a poco 15:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Jen Gupta interviewing Brian Cox at Stargazing Live --Mike Peel 06:39, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Fort Perch Rock entrance --Mike Peel 06:39, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review Good quality, but left part is hanging a bit to the right --Michielverbeek 06:56, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Fort Perch Rock --Mike Peel 06:39, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Abandoned structure at Berrington Hall --Mike Peel 06:39, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  Clear cw tilt --Poco a poco 15:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  @Poco a poco: Thanks for the review, I've corrected the perspective, does that look better now? Thanks. Mike Peel 15:25, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Seed pods of a Rhinanthus. Focus stack of 39 photos.
  --Famberhorst 06:12, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:16, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Flower bud of a Heracleum (plant). Focus stack of 18 photos.
  --Famberhorst 06:12, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:16, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Left valve of a Blue mussel, Mytilus edulis --Llez 05:14, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:35, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Wooden sculpture of an eagle at the forest playground Forst, Germany --Llez 05:14, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 05:23, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination White storks, Animal and bird park Forst, Germany --Llez 05:14, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 05:21, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination White storks, Animal and bird park Forst, Germany --Llez 05:14, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 05:22, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Cockatiels, Animal and bird park Forst, Germany --Llez 05:14, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:34, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Josefskapelle im Paderborner DomIch By User:Tsungam --Hangman'sDeath 05:08, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  Sharpness ist just ok but the blue CAs in the window should be removed --Poco a poco 16:02, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Harbour Centre in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada --XRay 03:11, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 04:08, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:10, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  Question Wouldn't people usually ask for perspective correction for a photo that looks like this? If not, why not? I ask purely to understand more and don't plan on voting against this nomination. -- Ikan Kekek 05:01, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  Reply:
  Hello Ikan, IMO it is convenient to adopt the three-point perspective for buildings such as towers, skyscrapers or similar, (especially when they are rounded) when viewed from low eye level. The evaluation of this perspective is not easy, because it is necessary to verify the position of three vanishing points positioned quite far from the main view. Maybe we can discuss it, although I double-checked the XRay's image and it looks great to me. --Terragio67 08:28, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  @Ikan Kekek: The answer of Terragio67 actually says it all. A shot from this point of view would be completely distorted and unsightly with verticals. It would no longer look natural. Especially with the high houses and the shooting position, such a perspective looks more natural. For perpendiculars, you need more distance, which is often not possible, especially in cities. --XRay 13:47, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  An addendum: Please see Three-point perspective --XRay 14:02, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  Thanks, guys. I appreciate your explanations. -- Ikan Kekek 18:20, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 20, 2022[edit]

- Nomination: View of hot springs of Federacion, Entre Rios Province, Argentina --Ezarate 21:20, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: View of hot springs of Federation, Entre Rios Province, Argentina --Ezarate 21:16, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: View of a square in Federación City, Entre Rios Province, Argentina --Ezarate 20:50, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: View of a building near Uruguay River in Federación City, Entre Rios Province, Argentina --Ezarate 20:46, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  Fine but please, fix the CA --Poco a poco 16:05, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  done, thanks --Ezarate 22:32, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  CA is still there and the picture is now far too bright and tilted, please, leave it as it was and address only the CA --Poco a poco 18:47, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
  done --Ezarate 23:20, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination View of a swimming pool in hot springs of Federacion, Entre Ríos Province, Argentina --Ezarate 20:37, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Are you sure it's a en:Hot spring? --Trougnouf
  Yes, I give you references in your talkpage --Ezarate 23:18, 20 July 2022 (UTC) 22:30, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
  Support Neat, thank you. Good quality. --Trougnouf 08:22, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Cow standing on a field in Chastre, Belgium --Trougnouf 19:51, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:05, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Mow Cop Castle --Mike Peel 19:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Mow Cop Castle --Mike Peel 19:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:05, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Mow Cop Castle --Mike Peel 19:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Sanatorio de Abona --Mike Peel 19:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Sanatorio de Abona --Mike Peel 19:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Bath white (Pontia edusa) --Charlesjsharp 16:46, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:17, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Black-veined white (Aporia crataegi) --Charlesjsharp 16:46, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:17, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Common brimsone (Gonepteryx rhamni) female --Charlesjsharp 16:46, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:17, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Clouded apollo (Parnassius mnemosyne) --Charlesjsharp 16:46, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose Eyes are not sharp. Sorry. --Ermell 20:35, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Mary Baker Eddy monument in Mount Auburn Cemetery --Rhododendrites 15:04, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:21, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Cylinder of a tuned BMW R69 S racing motorcycle with an open velocity stack. --Palauenc05 15:07, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:21, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Kebab King, Gdansk --MB-one 13:59, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:12, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Tail of a Daher TBM-910, AERO Friedrichshafen 2018 --MB-one 13:59, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: An der Stör in Neumünster. --Nightflyer 13:35, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Impressionen eines Wochenendes in Hamburg mit dem Titel: Wikipedia:Ahoi. Im Hintergrunf der Alte Schwede. --Nightflyer 13:28, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  Fine, but please, add one category about the subject and a suitable description --Poco a poco 16:12, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  Done Gruss --Nightflyer 17:58, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination A church in Virginia --Nheyob 12:51, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:12, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Interior of a church in Germany --Nheyob 12:51, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Interior of a church in Ohio --Nheyob 12:51, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Part of the western facade of the Residenz in Ansbach, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 12:21, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Chapel of Saint Florent in Xonrupt-Longemer (Vosges, France). --Gzen92 06:51, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  Good quality, but too dark. --Tournasol7 12:23, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
  Done It's better ? Gzen92 02:44, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Lake of Xonrupt-Longemer (Vosges, France). --Gzen92 06:51, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Skipping the Vats in Xonrupt-Longemer (Vosges, France). --Gzen92 06:51, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Alleé along the Daro in La Bilsbal d'Empordà, Catalonia, Spain --Kritzolina 06:17, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  CA in should be fixed. --Ermell 09:28, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Bell tower of Santa Maria de la Bisbal d'Empordà, Catalonia, Spain --Kritzolina 06:17, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Campaign "Turn waste into art", market square, Karlsruhe. --Llez 05:50, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed

July 19, 2022[edit]

- Nomination: Jet d'eau, Geneva --Mike Peel 20:28, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Brodick Castle --Mike Peel 20:28, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Seaweed kiln in Brittany --Romainbehar 18:06, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:10, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
  Peut-être l'effet du grand-angle, mais l'horizon n'est pas horizontal. Probablement très simple à corriger. --Jmh2o 17:49, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Municipal road towards Hessenburg on a cloudy day, Saal, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern --MB-one 11:34, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Rolls-Royce Wraith at Geneva International Motor Show 2019, Le Grand-Saconnex --MB-one 11:34, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Mubarak Mahal, Jaipur --Chainwit. 09:13, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  Needs perspective correction, it's a little bit tilted --Romainbehar 18:12, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
  Info Please do not set to "Discuss" without any vote. I reverted the status to "Nominaion". --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:34, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: East Asiatic Company Building, Bangkok --Chainwit. 09:13, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Coral (Acropora hemprichii), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt --Poco a poco 08:18, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Coral grouper (Cephalopholis miniata), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt --Poco a poco 08:18, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Lunar-tailed bigeye (Priacanthus hamrur), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt --Poco a poco 08:18, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: BMW Baur TopCabriolet 1 --Ermell 06:51, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: A train going out from Liziba Station, Line 2. By User:W.carter --Q28 06:47, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Sultan Ibrahim Building. By User:Fxchua --Q28 06:47, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review Comment. The image needs perspective correction, if possible. Further the colors seem oversaturated. -- Spurzem 07:31, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Yamagata Castle hon-maru. By User:Saigen Jiro --Q28 06:47, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Garage in Carrer de l'Allada in Palamós, Catalonia, Spain --Kritzolina 06:41, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Wooden door in Ullastret, Catalonia, Spain --Kritzolina 06:41, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Water tank from 1930 at Plaça de Pedró in Palamós, Catalonia, Spain --Kritzolina 06:41, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed

July 18, 2022[edit]

- Nomination Common fleabane (Pulicaria dysenterica) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:22, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Yann 14:41, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Bessenbach, nature monument 2 Linden in Keilberg, tree grotto with pieta in one if the lime trees --KaiBorgeest 20:12, 18 July 2022 (UTC) The colors seem to be too cold/blue. White balance correction may improve it. Yann 14:46, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Parc del Convent dels Agustins de Palamós, Catalonia, Spain. Description on the remains of the entrance --Kritzolina 18:25, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Parc del Convent dels Agustins de Palamós, Catalonia, Spain. Remains of the cloister --Kritzolina 18:25, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Mġarr ix-Xini Bay, Gozo Island, Malta --Poco a poco 16:43, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Gendarmerie Motorized Parade in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 16:31, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Panch Batti Circle, Jaipur --Chainwit. 15:29, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Gaitore ki Chhatriyan --Chainwit. 15:29, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Public garden on 4th Lyuberetsky Proezd, Moscow. --Александр Мотин 12:19, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Open wing basking position of Acraea issoria Hübner, 1819 - Yellow Coster (by Kush.butterfly) --Atudu 10:41, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  over saturated --Charlesjsharp 15:28, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Rolls-Royce Corniche from 1985 at Solitude Revival 2022.--Alexander-93 09:24, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Split-flap display and airport check-in in Terminal 1 of Frankfurt Main Airport
  --F. Riedelio 09:18, 18 July 2022 (UTC) No EXIF data, a bit noisy. Yann 14:51, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Terminal car park in Terminal 1 of Frankfurt Main Airport
  --F. Riedelio 09:18, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Barrier-free boarding at Palma de Mallorca Airport
  --F. Riedelio 09:18, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Chicken wings with hot sauce --Kritzolina 06:55, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Street cleaning in the Barri Gotic, Barcelona, Spain. A hand pushed waste collection vehicle --Kritzolina 06:55, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  Please check the verticals. --Ermell 08:38, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: The merchant and the fishing boat. --PROPOLI87 08:46, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: The merchant and the fishing boat. --PROPOLI87 08:46, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Sin título (Andreu Alfaro), Tenerife --Mike Peel 06:15, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Móvil (Francisco Sobrino), Tenerife --Mike Peel 06:15, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Móvil (Francisco Sobrino), Tenerife --Mike Peel 06:15, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed

July 17, 2022[edit]

- Nomination: Partial view of Loggetta Veneziana and Rocchetta di Piazza (Piazza del Popolo).jpg --Terragio67 21:37, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Partial view of Loggetta Veneziana and Rocchetta di Piazza (Piazza del Popolo).jpg --Terragio67 21:37, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Partial view of the historical center (Piazza del Popolo - Cesena) --Terragio67 21:37, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  Is this photo of a statue legal per COM:FOP Italy? --Tagooty 03:05, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
  @Tagooty , THX 4 your enquiry. The statue is property of the author and he is pleased to see his creation published on commons. --Terragio67 04:34, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Statue Fatou at the balcony - by Leonardo Lucchi --Terragio67 21:37, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  Is this photo of a statue legal per COM:FOP Italy? --Tagooty 03:05, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
  @Tagooty , THX 4 your enquiry. The statue is property of the author and he is pleased to see his creation published on commons. --Terragio67 04:34, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Grossostheim, protected landscape element Sprenkenhohle, in 'LSG innerhalb des Naturparks Spessart (ehemals Schutzzone)' --KaiBorgeest 21:36, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Six-spot burnet (Zygaena filipendulae) --Charlesjsharp 20:00, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Edelweißstraße - Glocknergruppe --Linie29 19:33, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  Strong CA should be removed. --Ermell 21:28, 17 July 2022 (UTC) I can't believe the roadway is so inclined. --Milseburg 12:45, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination View from Table Mountain, Cape Town --Mike Peel 16:58, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 20:19, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Brodick Castle --Mike Peel 16:58, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Yann 14:59, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Monument to Manuel Rodriguez. Santiago. --Rjcastillo 16:15, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: A lighthouse in the night sky. By User:Wcfan49 --Q28 15:37, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: The Photo of No. 45 Fenyang Road, Shanghai, designed by Ladislav Hudec. Built in 1932, it was the former official residence for Deputy Inspector-General of the Chinese Maritime Customs Service. It is listed in the Shanghai Cultural Relics Protection Unit and the Shanghai Heritage Architecture List. By User:DreamerBlue --Q28 15:37, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  Verticals should be corrected. --Ermell 09:34, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Viola x williamsii (also known as horned pansy), "Ullas Favorit". Part of the "green cultural heritage" in Sweden according to the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences SLU.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Vitaly repin 14:48, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Viola x williamsii (also known as horned pansy), "Ullas Favorit". Part of the "green cultural heritage" in Sweden according to the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences SLU.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Vitaly repin 14:48, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Lifeguard tower 18 in Venice Beach County Park (July 2022) --Benoît Prieur 13:44, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  Too many dust spots --Jmh2o 13:57, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Common smilax (Smilax aspera) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:06, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Wankel aircraft engine at AERO Friedrichshafen 2018 --MB-one 09:49, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Mooney M20K at Mainz-Finthen airfield --MB-one 09:49, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Allegory of the Rhône river --Romainbehar 09:38, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Allegory of Liberty, bust --Romainbehar 09:38, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Map of the 19th-20th century South Caucasian Khanates and their surroundings --Golden 09:01, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Military and Political situation in the western part of the Qazakh District of Azerbaijan --Golden 09:01, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Motorized parade of firefighters in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 07:58, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Motorized parade of firefighters in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 07:58, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Motorized parade of firefighters in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 07:58, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Agro the Clown in the show "ImproLocura" at 35. ULICA – The International Festival of Street Theatres in Kraków --Jakubhal 05:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Jila Su tract: in the upper reaches of the Malka River, at the foot of Mount Elbrus--AlixSaz 03:39, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  Nice, but it could be sharper... --Tournasol7 04:29, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
  Done I agree. Increased the sharper--AlixSaz 05:15, 17 July 2022(UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Jila Su tract: in the upper reaches of the Malka River, at the foot of Mount Elbrus--AlixSaz 03:39, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Jila Su tract: in the upper reaches of the Malka River, at the foot of Mount Elbrus--AlixSaz 03:39, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Jila Su tract: in the upper reaches of the Malka River, at the foot of Mount Elbrus--AlixSaz 03:39, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed

July 16, 2022[edit]

- Nomination Oceanwide Plaza III, II, I in construction (July 2022) --Benoît Prieur 22:03, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Yann 15:00, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Refugee at Prague main station. --janbery 21:46, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Yann 15:02, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Refugee at Prague main station. --janbery 21:46, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Yann 15:02, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Nature reserve and FFH area 'Amerikafeld und Schindkaute bei Steinheim' --KaiBorgeest 21:15, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Jila Su tract: in the upper reaches of the Malka River, at the foot of Mount Elbrus, Zolsky district, Kabardino-Balkaria--AlixSaz 18:56, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Chegem gorge: In the gorge of the Chegem river, 2-3 km above the village of Khushto Syrt, Khushtosyrt, Chegem district, Kabardino-Balkaria--AlixSaz 18:56, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --NiaPol 08:55, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Chegem gorge: In the gorge of the Chegem river, 2-3 km above the village of Khushto Syrt, Khushtosyrt, Chegem district, Kabardino-Balkaria--AlixSaz 18:56, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --NiaPol 08:55, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Aan de Statie, Susteren --MB-one 13:22, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Mascaron in Vyšehrad, Prague, Czechia --JiriMatejicek 10:59, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review Comment It seems a little underexposed, can you fix the levels a little bit? --Sailko 15:43, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: 152nd Infantry Parade in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 07:19, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Navy Parade in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 07:19, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Parade of firefighters in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 07:19, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed

July 15, 2022[edit]

- Nomination: Palazzo gherardesca in Livorno, Italy --Sailko 20:31, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Rue Brugière (Dieulefit) en juillet 2022. By User:Benoît Prieur--Ezarate 20:23, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Tesla Model Y in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 19:26, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review Comment. Upper part too bright, disturbing "hustle and bustle" all around -- Spurzem 12:31, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
  I uploaded a new version.--Alexander-93 08:13, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Volkswagen ID.4 Pro in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 16:51, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Volkswagen Golf VIII in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 16:51, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: 3d aerial imaging demonstrator of DLR at ILA 2018 --MB-one 15:29, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Interboot 2020, Performance Marine 91 at Friedrichshafen --MB-one 15:29, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: View of Avoriaz, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 15:28, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Jutsa Mountain: 12 km south of Pyatigorsk, Foothill district, Stavropol Territory--AlixSaz 14:56, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Beshtau Mountain: Pyatigorsk, Stavropol Territory--AlixSaz 14:56, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Chegem gorge: In the gorge of the Chegem river, 2-3 km above the village of Khushto Syrt, Khushtosyrt, Chegem district, Kabardino-Balkaria--AlixSaz 14:56, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Jurfeld 08:40, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Chegem gorge: In the gorge of the Chegem river, 2-3 km above the village of Khushto Syrt, Khushtosyrt, Chegem district, Kabardino-Balkaria--AlixSaz 14:56, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Jurfeld 08:40, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination MG B Roadster --Ermell 14:18, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:32, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Boss at the church Santa Maria de Palamós --Kritzolina 12:38, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:32, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination Boss at the church Santa Maria de Palamós --Kritzolina 12:38, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Gurfinkeld 09:15, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Spessart in autumn, nature monument Bomigsee --KaiBorgeest 10:31, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Sheep in Hamburg --KaiBorgeest 10:29, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Church of the Saviour, Beijing. By User:ZhengZhou --Q28 08:21, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review Needs perspective correction.--Milseburg 12:47, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Mayor Éric Straumann in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 05:13, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Flag of the 152nd RI in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 05:13, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Statue of the Virgin and Child in Ribeauvillé (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 05:13, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  Madonna's face is largely obscured. A different angle would be better. --Tagooty 06:30, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 14, 2022[edit]

- Nomination Three dimensional perspective of the Euphrasian Basilica's bell tower, where the sunset created a magic golden light on the pale gray object. - Poreč - Parenzo (Istria) --Terragio67 16:32, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
  Uploaded a new version --Terragio67 05:23, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:26, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 12, 2022[edit]

July 11, 2022[edit]

- Nomination: Door knocker in Rue Monsieur, Paris 7th (by Moonik) --Sebring12Hrs 18:52, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
  The picture is not straight aligned (tilt to the left). --F. Riedelio 09:17, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Kantanagar Temple, Bangladesh. By User:Pinu Rahman --IamMM 10:32, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion This is not close to rectilinear, which might be OK except that it's clearly leaning more to the left than the right. I think it needs some additional editing to be a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 11:56, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
  I did not understand the problem you mentioned. It should be noted that this building has a tricky architecture in almost all angles, even from the front view. See Category:Kantanagar Temple. -- IamMM 20:00, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
  Comment I understand and did look at other pictures of it. What I'm saying is, if you look at the left outer wall, it slants quite a bit further than the right outer wall does. Does this temple really look like that, or is it a function of the angle? I think it's a function of the angle. -- Ikan Kekek 02:17, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
  I tried to make some changes, but unfortunately the final result was worse than this. Maybe aerial photographers have some ideas about this situation. -- IamMM 10:48, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
  I gave it a try. Maybe that's ok? --Ermell 19:55, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
  Support Thanks, Ermell. I like it. It does crop significantly, though, so I hope Pinu Rahman would be OK with it. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 18:17, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 10, 2022[edit]

- Nomination: Berlin-Friedrichstadt, nature monument 1-10/B, two Japanese pagoda trees (Sophora japonica) and cultural heritage monument Handelsstätte Friedrichstadt --KaiBorgeest 22:16, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  Scientific names should be formatted in italics. --F. Riedelio 09:13, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
  I do not know the rule with the formatting scientific names in italics. Can I please have an indication of the source? --XRay 12:51, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
  Answered Please see here or hier. --F. Riedelio 07:08, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
  Comment But that is Wikipedia and has no relevance here. --XRay 14:51, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Xuanmen Bay No.3 Bridge, Yuhuan Lake and the greenroad of Yuhuan Lake. By User:MintCandy --Q28 05:45, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  Wrong category (redlink) --F. Riedelio 09:10, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 9, 2022[edit]

- Nomination: Vue du quartier d'affaires de Los Angeles (juillet 2022) et de deux grues sur sites de construction. --Benoît Prieur 11:16, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  Also affected by the same dust spots --MB-one 10:10, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Lifeguard tower, Santa Monica State Beach (July 2022). --Benoît Prieur 10:25, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  Same two dust spots as in the other image --MB-one 10:10, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination: Lifeguard tower, Santa Monica State Beach (July 2022). --Benoît Prieur 10:25, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  very slightly tilted CCW (check the horizon) --MB-one 10:06, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
  Also marked two dustspots --MB-one 10:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 8, 2022[edit]

- Nomination: Garages, Rue Robert Schumann, in Marcq-en-Barœul, France --Velvet 09:09, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
  The prominent bollards and the shadow in the foreground are distracting to me. They do not add to the composition of the garages. Otherwise a good image. --Tagooty 10:42, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 6, 2022[edit]

- Nomination Orange daylily (Hemerocallis fulva) --Ввласенко 19:42, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Promotion
  Scientific names should be formatted in italics. --F. Riedelio 16:18, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
  Done -- Ввласенко 05:51, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
  SupportExcellent sharpness, good quality --Kritzolina 12:26, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consensual review[edit]

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.

Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.

Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted

In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Oppose and Support if necessary.
Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".

Consensual Review[edit]

File:Alga_roja_(Mesophyllum_expansum),_Parque_natural_de_la_Arrábida,_Portugal,_2021-09-09,_DD_08.jpg[edit]

Nomination Red algae (Mesophyllum expansum), Arrábida Natural Park, Portugal --Poco a poco 07:44, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion
Oppose A bit too noisy and blurry. --MB-one 17:01, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Please, let's discuss, the upper part is out of focus but the middle and lower part look definitely better, overall I think that considering the underwater conditions, it deserves the QI stamp --Poco a poco 18:49, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hong_Kong_Island_Skyline_2009.jpg[edit]

Nomination Skyline of Central, filmed on 2009-06-20. By User:WiNG --Q28 08:21, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion
QI requires an accurate image description which is missing here. GPS coordinates would also be helpful. --GRDN711 16:19, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
I updated the image description. --Steven Sun 14:43, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Support. --GRDN711 14:17, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Regarding the low resolution, I expect more sharpness and less noise. --Milseburg 18:25, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Milseburg. Had this photo been nominated in 2009, it might have passed, but even then, there were sharper cityscape photos. -- Ikan Kekek 05:04, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Less than 3 MPixels from a 12 MPixels camera. I don't mind a certain amount of downscaling, but this is too much and it has lost too much detail. Composition and lighting are nice. --Smial 07:46, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Smial --Jakubhal 09:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline? --Milseburg 13:10, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moltinden_behind_Fredvang_in_Flakstad,_Nordland,_Norway,_2022_June.jpg[edit]

Nomination Moltinden behind Fredvang village, Norway --Ximonic 13:49, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion
Oppose Beautiful but out of focus --Romainbehar 18:12, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks good to me on my 23.5-inch monitor. -- Ikan Kekek 03:24, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks sharp also for me --Jakubhal 06:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Noise reduction somewhat overdone, some burnt highlights (the boats), but overall, however, it is in any case a QI. Very nice lighting and composition. --Smial 10:34, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would be curious what is meant by out of focus, as I don't really find a very bad focus area in the mountains or houses, so that I could do better. I now agree that some details may be lessened in shadows, but it's not from noise reduction (which I barely did), but probably because the camera captures less detail from dark areas. I should have done in HDR, I now think. --Ximonic 12:03, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- These areas in the shadows are very difficult to capture. To me, they look pretty natural. Kodachrome 25 would not really have made it better. ;-) I would never ask for exposure bracketing with tone mapping/hdr for QIC when it comes to landscape photography. --Smial 15:01, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - I'm sure you'll have to change the tactics with Kodachrome for sure. :-D --Ximonic (talk) 11:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good sharpness. --Milseburg 13:08, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Milseburg 13:08, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hélicoptère_de_la_Gendarmerie_(Xonrupt-Longemer)_(3).jpg[edit]

Nomination Gendarmerie helicopter in Xonrupt-Longemer (Vosges, France). --Gzen92 12:53, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion
Why is there a blurred tree behind the helicopter? --Romainbehar 18:12, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]
Support Looks like hot air and fumes from the exhaust outlet. QI for me --Jakubhal 18:54, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]
Support per Jakubhal. -- Ikan Kekek 03:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Jakubhal. -- Smial 10:45, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jakubhal, at first I thought about exhaust fumes too. But the helicopter's exhaust is much higher and I can't imagine hot air falling straight down. For me, the blur is inexplicable. Best regards -- Spurzem 14:34, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Spurzem. --Sebring12Hrs 14:44, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Der Rotor bläst das anscheinend mit Macht nach unten. --Smial 15:03, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Jakubhal. --MB-one 16:53, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Smial: Ich kann es mir nicht vorstellen, dass der Rotor die Abgase so gebündelt senkrecht nach unten treibt. Zumindest bei dem Eurocopter] werden sie waagerecht nach hinten rausgeblasen, was auch an der Verschmutzung zu sehen ist. Wir werden wahrscheinlich nicht herausfinden, woher die unscharfe Stelle im zu bewertenden Bild kommt. Viele Grüße -- Spurzem 18:36, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hier https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ai72vtvJcCw bei 2:24 oder auch hier: https://media04.meinbezirk.at/article/2017/05/18/2/10377702_L.jpg ganz gut zu sehen -- Smial 23:07, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support I assume it's all because of the downdraft caused by the rotor blades, where the hot air is forced downwards. It has to be. The only way to sharpen the tree again is to shut down the engine. A QI for me.--Ximonic 11:58, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Hello @Romainbehar, Jakubhal, Ikan Kekek, Smial, Spurzem, Sebring12Hrs, MB-one, and Ximonic: I made a video of the helicopter landing (File:Hélicoptère de la Gendarmerie (Xonrupt-Longemer).ogg), then photos at vertical take-off. It is not the gases that go down but the helicopter that goes up. Gzen92 ^[discuter] 12:32, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good video. You can even see that the gas would probably try to go a little upwards too, but it can't get far up because of the strong drafts. (There is some blur even above the exhaust pipe.) So it mostly goes down, or slightly backwards, depending the movement. In anycase, it's a natural phenomenon, and not a photography related blur in anyway. --Ximonic 13:06, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:38, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kowloon_Byewash_Reservoir_201707.jpg[edit]

Nomination Kowloon Byewash Reservoir. By User:Wpcpey --Q28 06:47, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion Support Good quality. --Kritzolina 10:31, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Below the size hard limit --Jakubhal 19:13, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Jakubhal. --MB-one 16:50, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --MB-one 12:06, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zhenchenglou.JPG[edit]

Nomination Zhenchenglou, a rotunda tulou in Yongding county, Fujian. By User:Gisling --Q28 06:47, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Kritzolina 10:31, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]
Oppose For me it is too small for architecture picture. It's just 3 MP with little detail. --Jakubhal 19:11, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Jakubhal. However, it is amazing what photoshop has done with the really bad original. --Smial 07:50, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --MB-one 10:22, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lynk_&_Co_01_PHEV_1X7A0309.jpg[edit]

Nomination Lynk & Co 01 PHEV in Böblingen.--Alexander-93 10:41, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion Oppose. No good quality because the upper part is too bright und the background is distracting. -- Spurzem 12:23, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
I agree it's too bright, but perhaps that's an easy thing to fix? Disagree that the background is distracting. --Mike Peel 17:20, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded a new version.--Alexander-93 08:13, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Support the new version looks better. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:22, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm amazed how low the requirements for QI of automobiles have become. -- Spurzem 13:26, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral I don't want to give a rating, but at least a comment. In my opinion, the background is too bumpy and lacks space around the car. That may also be personal taste. --XRay 15:49, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. These parking lot images are all horrible, sorry. --Smial 16:09, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral it's overexposed (hopefully fixable). Support Overexposure is fixed. The composition is not FP worthy but fine for QI. --MB-one (talk) 16:47, 20 July 2022 (UTC)--MB-one 11:32, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support by MB-one. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:23, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --MB-one 12:05, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Piazzale_Michelangelo_in_Florence.jpg[edit]

Nomination Piazzale Michelangelo in Florence --Wikibusters 15:12, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion Oppose Poor composition, too much asphalt --Sailko 19:49, 14 July 2022 (UTC))
Now Sailko? Thank you --Wikibusters 22:25, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Support Big improvement and good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 02:23, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Poor composition, but completly in focus. I don't know... --Sebring12Hrs 05:27, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree that this plaza is a challening subject but composition is crowded and tones are dull. --GRDN711 14:26, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor composition. Too much empty sky. --Milseburg 13:06, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --Milseburg 13:06, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Timetable (day 8 after nomination)[edit]

Fri 15 Jul → Sat 23 Jul
Sat 16 Jul → Sun 24 Jul
Sun 17 Jul → Mon 25 Jul
Mon 18 Jul → Tue 26 Jul
Tue 19 Jul → Wed 27 Jul
Wed 20 Jul → Thu 28 Jul
Thu 21 Jul → Fri 29 Jul
Fri 22 Jul → Sat 30 Jul
Sat 23 Jul → Sun 31 Jul

Commons:Quality images candidates